<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return of the 100% mortgage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisisguernsey.com/2009/11/21/return-of-the-100-mortgage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisisguernsey.com/2009/11/21/return-of-the-100-mortgage/</link>
	<description>Island News, Sport, Community &#38; Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Le Page</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisguernsey.com/2009/11/21/return-of-the-100-mortgage/#comment-56796</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Le Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisisguernsey.com/?p=39627#comment-56796</guid>
		<description>Steve - it is still technically a 100% mortgage as the lender still provides 100% of the capital; the only difference is that 15% of the loan is secured against another family member.

I do get your point though and would suggest there are better ways to fund a house purchase than this.  For example, why get your parents to stash 15% of their savings at Skipton as security, when they could either give the money to their children or lend it at a rate of interest that is:

- lower than the mortgage thus saving the children money

- higher than Skipton are paying out, this making it an investment - albeit higher risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8211; it is still technically a 100% mortgage as the lender still provides 100% of the capital; the only difference is that 15% of the loan is secured against another family member.</p>
<p>I do get your point though and would suggest there are better ways to fund a house purchase than this.  For example, why get your parents to stash 15% of their savings at Skipton as security, when they could either give the money to their children or lend it at a rate of interest that is:</p>
<p>- lower than the mortgage thus saving the children money</p>
<p>- higher than Skipton are paying out, this making it an investment &#8211; albeit higher risk.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.thisisguernsey.com/comment-reports/?c=56796" rel="nofollow">Report abuse</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vee</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisguernsey.com/2009/11/21/return-of-the-100-mortgage/#comment-56786</link>
		<dc:creator>Vee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisisguernsey.com/?p=39627#comment-56786</guid>
		<description>Skipton states: Its Next Generation Mortgage does, however, require a family member to act as guarantor for a maximum of 15% of the purchase price.

Who in their right mind would go as guarantor and put a bond on their house for someone else, i certianly wouldnt!!!

I think first time buyers(i was one last year thank you) should just face it, life has changed and if you have to put up 10% then save save save!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skipton states: Its Next Generation Mortgage does, however, require a family member to act as guarantor for a maximum of 15% of the purchase price.</p>
<p>Who in their right mind would go as guarantor and put a bond on their house for someone else, i certianly wouldnt!!!</p>
<p>I think first time buyers(i was one last year thank you) should just face it, life has changed and if you have to put up 10% then save save save!!!
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.thisisguernsey.com/comment-reports/?c=56786" rel="nofollow">Report abuse</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Le Cheminant</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisguernsey.com/2009/11/21/return-of-the-100-mortgage/#comment-56749</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Le Cheminant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisisguernsey.com/?p=39627#comment-56749</guid>
		<description>So that would be a 85% mortgage then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that would be a 85% mortgage then.
<p align="right"><a href="http://www.thisisguernsey.com/comment-reports/?c=56749" rel="nofollow">Report abuse</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
