Spartacus That article deals with just over 100 senior public sector employees, not to the other 4,600. There is no mention of any extra salary for them in that article is there? Those 100-plus top earning employees were always going to be treated separately. The Bailiff is hardly going to be told "Take it or leave it" is he? Does Mr. Lanning's union represent the Bailiff as well? Have you worked out whether the proposed extra salary fully compensates the employee for the reduced pension benefit? I strongly suspect that the taxpayer will be better off, at the expense of the employee. I think I also "robustly" said that the size of the public workforce would need to be cut in order to be able to afford the CARE scheme. I maintain that position re. the remaining 4600 public sector workers. For them it would well be "take it or leave it".
Voice For Victims
Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.
