Please describe your concerns with this comment. If you simply wish to respond to the comment please use the Comment Box on the story itself:
The so called harbour 'Master Plan' is based on a report that contains no serious presentation of alternatives, no real cost/benefit analysis, and no technical assessment of suggested projects. To describe the report as a 'Master Plan' is wishful thinking. Yet it is the politest description that can be bestowed. It is unthinkable that anyone should imagine basing decisions about an important feature and vital piece of Guernsey infrastructure on a work that apparently devoted more attention to the quality of its photos of the port than to the quality of its technical and economic assumptions. Hopefully someone, somewhere, will start asking serious questions and demanding credible answers?