Please describe your concerns with this comment. If you simply wish to respond to the comment please use the Comment Box on the story itself:
bcb I do believe that putting taxes up will help to reduce the number of fags people smoke and will influence some to give up. This will assist the overall strategy in which they seem to be trying everything and everything to gradually eradicate the habit. However I don't agree with the government collecting revenue on sales of anything which causes harm to people as this is "profiting" from harmful activities which is morally conflicted. There is a subtle difference between disapproval of the strategy and believing it would work. Does that make sense? Sorry if I have been inconsistent at some point, you could be right, or if there was a misunderstanding but I hope that clarifies my current feelings on it.