Lessons to be learned from LVCR
Monday 14th November 2011, 2:45PM GMT.
AS THE grim realisation sinks in that the island’s economy has suffered a savage blow at the hands of the UK Treasury it is clear that the loss of the fulfilment sector is more of a probability than a possibility.
The Swiss Post spokesman could not contain his rather smug glee last week at the prospect of companies jumping ship in search of the competitive advantage that comes with VAT avoidance.
Quite why he is so confident that the UK will not seek to shut down the Swiss fulfilment trade in similarly brutal fashion is not clear. However, by that time it will be a bitter victory for the Channel Islands as the damage here will already have been done.
Of course, there is hope that a legal challenge to the Treasury decision may be successful. On the face of it the islands are being singled out for unfair treatment while other jurisdictions outside the EU are unaffected. It is blatant discrimination.
However, confidence in the justice of that case should be mitigated by the central premise that the UK has decided to stamp out the VAT-relief trade from the Channel Islands. It may be window dressing to appease the under-pressure high street retail sector but if the UK government is determined to end it there are many measures which can be used.
A successful LVCR industry relies, for example, on a partnership with the Royal Mail. If the government is actively hostile to the trade it is hard to see its postal service keeping prices down and delivering on time.
The lesson to be learned here is that once a decision has been made it is hard to get it reversed. Hundreds of jobs and millions in tax revenue are likely to go as a result.
The time to prevent the move was many months ago when the trade built up to a level that the government found impossible to ignore.
It is a lesson to which the finance industry must pay attention if it is to avoid a similarly arbitrary decision. The island has wisely embraced the quality end of the market in recent years and steered clear of areas likely to offend. It must continue to do so as hostility to our main industry would make the loss of the fulfilment sector seem a drop in the ocean.
Island Life
All about Guernsey
Ambassador of the Year 2011
History & Heritage
Visitor Information
Guernsey's government
Campaigns
Voice For Victims
Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.
Yes the lesson to be learned is don’t scam the system. Run a proper business.
Report abuse
so what is not “proper” about selling flowers by post, or printing greetings cards in Guernsey and supplying them by post.
it isn’t all CDs shipped from the UK and back again – and the people who did that were UK companies anyway
Report abuse
Why would you sell flowers and cards from Guernsey. Surely its nothing to do with VAT avoidance ? And if it isn’t WHY COMPLAIN ABOUT LOSING THAT ADVANTAGE ! As Ken says. Accept it with grace. It was good while it lasted.
Report abuse
If you live in Guernsey then you would set up a business here. Must we all set up business in the UK to keep you happy?
The complaints are because only those businesses in the CI have been singled out. If the EU scrapped LVCR entirely and treated every country the same, then there would be no reason to complain.
Report abuse
Terry: You seem to have a genuine understanding problem here. We don’t object to you setting up a business in Guernsey. Of course you would. You live there. We don’t even object to you supplying UK customers in competition with us. That’s business. What we DO object to and extremely strongly is you doing so with a 20% TAX ADVANTAGE. That is the problem. Now tell me again. What justification do you have for seeking the continuation of this nonsense?
Report abuse
QUOTING “Of course, there is hope that a legal challenge to the Treasury decision may be successful. On the face of it the islands are being singled out for unfair treatment while other jurisdictions outside the EU are unaffected. It is blatant discrimination.”
What total unadulterated tripe. Islands treated unfairly indeed. Your traders have been ripping off the UK VAT system for 15 years. They have taken an unfair advantage over UK traders, now 20%, and when the UK finally, at long last, takes the necessary action to stop the scam, the scammers shout “foul”. There are no grounds for a challenge. The action has been taken against the Channel Islands for the simple reason that it is the Channel Islands from where the problem emanates. HM Treasury has made clear that if it pops up from another location then similar action will be taken there so there is no discrimination. What do the Islands have to say about the discrimination of the past 15 years against UK suppliers IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY? Not very much at all. Come on. You are bang to rights in this. Have the grace to accept it.
Report abuse