THERE are many politicians leaving the States next month. Some have decades of service behind them and they will make serious withdrawals from the island’s political bank of experience.

Many have an enviable breadth of knowledge gained through multiple senior posts while others have, through a long-term commitment to one committee, attained a depth of understanding the equal of senior civil servants.

But it is the loss of one of the States’ newer members that could be the most damaging as this House struggles to cope with wholesale change.

Stuart Falla was first elected in 2004, yet he was immediately made a minister. Within a few years he was deputy chief minister and widely regarded as one of the few credible contenders for the top job.

For many, the accomplished businessman and sports administrator was starkly alone on a shortlist of members who, devoid of real power, could persuade 10 disparate ministers to pull for the common good and a corporate vision rather than their own departments.

That he has chosen not to, despite setting aside eight years for the job, is a damning indictment of this House.

For it is clear from reading his letter on this page that there is one overriding factor in his decision.

Not workload, political principle, media intrusion, family disruption nor any of the other reasons usually cited on these occasions.

Instead it is mischief-makers: States members who would seek to undermine him because of who he is rather than what he wants for the island. Deputies who would create tension through political manoeuvrings to satisfy their own ends – and thwart his.

It is a sorry message. And one that will resonate with others outside the States, especially business people, who may be thinking of throwing their hat into the ring even at this late stage.

Is it worth it, they must think, if such a proven leader can give up in such disgust after just four years?