‘Bullied’ St John PA is vindicated
Saturday 28th February 2009, 9:30AM GMT.
BOARD members and senior management of the St John Ambulance and Rescue Service have been severely criticised for tolerating the unacceptable behaviour of its former chief officer towards his ex-PA.
In a strongly-worded judgment, an employment and discrimination panel ruled that there was no denying the hurt and upset that Neil Tucker had caused Jean Guilbert.
Panel chairman Georgette Scott said the board had chosen to move Mr Tucker to a new role with less day-to-day contact with staff rather than deal with the issue of his poor people management skills in a more resolute and direct way.
Mrs Guilbert (pictured) had claimed at a hearing that she had had no choice but to leave the service last May after Mr Tucker had treated her ‘more like a piece of furniture than a human being’.
Her complaint was upheld unanimously and Mrs Guilbert was awarded the maximum sum of six months’ pay – £13,579.
Senior officers, the HR manager and the board were often witnesses to Mr Tucker’s inappropriate treatment towards Mrs Guilbert and her complaints were ignored.
In a statement released yesterday, the board said it was aware of the panel’s judgment but did not wish to comment further, although it did confirm that Mr Tucker remained suspended. ‘That being the case, it is inappropriate that the reasons for that suspension be commented on until matters have been resolved.’
Mr Tucker said yesterday that he had and still did deny the claims that had been made against him, but he was unable to comment further for contractual reasons.
Mrs Guilbert said she was obviously delighted at the panel’s decision and said it vindicated the position she had maintained over the lack of support from her ex-employer.
- To read Guernsey Press stories in full click here for subscription details. Individual editions are now available online.
Campaigns
Voice For Victims
Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.
I think it is disgraceful that an employee should be treated this way. Who are the Board members who allowed this to happen and are they members of any other Boards?
Report abuse
Well the good news is employers have legal recourse that we never had when i started working. Be encouraged, it seems to work.
Report abuse
If an employer has been, effectively, guilty of bullying that would constitute ‘gross misconduct’. Gross misconduct can mean a number of things; loss of job, demotion or some other disciplinary measure.
Report abuse
I Know two of the board members at the time were Deputy Hunter Adam and Deputy Bill Bell! It seems to me that it is unfair to balme just Mr Tucker as it is quite clear that the HR Manager, Mrs Marquis and the Board should take some responsibility. As the Service is funded by a Government grant and it involved two deputies, surely an external inquiry would be appropriate?
Report abuse
£13 k isnt much of a deterrent to them or help for her.
Report abuse
Andy – the loss of face is also a deterrant. Not only does is blacken someone’s name in a small community that doesn’t have a habit of forgetting such things quickly – if at all, it may also make finding a quality replacement rather difficult.
Report abuse
I fail to see how the finger of blame can be pointed at anybody other than Mr Tucker. We have only heard one side of this story and maybe it is time for the board to pass comment. The press has implied that other senior staff members were aware of the “bullying” but how could they be expected to deal with the issue when the person they ultimately reported to was Mr Tucker himself, as Chief Executive. In a situation such as this then surely the Board of Directors is the only party who were in a position to deal with the problem.
Report abuse