Fighting the drip-feed of animosity
Tuesday 14th April 2009, 2:18PM BST.
WHAT the Easter weekend’s row in the UK over a sleazy and cynical plan to destabilise the Conservative Party indicates is just what an uphill battle the Crown Dependencies have in persuading those in power that the jurisdictions are not tax havens.
The whole point of the Damian McBride emails scandal was that the online blog he was proposing to use to damage leading Tories and the party’s electability next year was not bothered about truth.
As long as absolutely reprehensible material appeared believable and was as a result wounding, that was good enough for the man who was a special adviser to Gordon Brown.
While the Prime Minister appears not to have been directly involved, the message is that at least some on his team believe this is an acceptable way to conduct government.
Why does it matter to Guernsey? For the simple fact that – email scandals apart – the Labour government has no qualms in manipulating facts to suit its own purpose.
We have already seen that over the high-level briefings against these islands and the constant reference to the dependencies as tax havens.
Even when the OECD gives the Bailiwicks a clean bill of health, it is not good enough for either the UK’s Chancellor or Prime Minister. Still the drip-feed of animosity continues, still the same reference to ‘tax havens’.
In many respects, where we are is worse than before the G20 summit. Then, there was a chance that the islands would, indeed, be found wanting. What is now clear, however, is that there is an underlying element of malice aimed at the offshore dependencies and it emanates from Downing Street.
As the Financial Times reported last week, Mr Brown wants the Crown Dependencies to go beyond the current minimum standards of regulation and transparency, begging the question, what standards are we trying to achieve?
The reality is that acceptability is whatever Mr Brown chooses on any given day and depends on what else he is trying to divert attention from domestically. If his key officials are happy to smear the Conservative Party, with all its political muscle, it indicates the very real difficulties facing these islands in the months ahead.
Campaigns
Voice For Victims
Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.
You are so absolutely correct to highlight the corrosive, spiteful, nasty and duplicitous nature of the brown regime and the danger it continues to pose to our island.
This unelected control freak of a PM is bad news for every single person in Guernsey and the spin and lies against us will continue so long as he remains in power.
As The Spectator’s Matthew D’Ancona pointed out last weekend: “McBride has gone. But the mentality he personified survives in the corridors and offices of Whitehall. There are 417 days until June 3, 2010, the last possible day on which the general election can be held. It isn’t over yet.”
Our best hope is that the UK electorate will be given the opportunity to throw out this bunch of sleazy gangsters sooner rather than later. Whatever his shortcomings, Cameron will surely be a better bet, both for Channel Islanders and for the UK populace.
Report abuse
Surely you are just using another Government’s faults to distract from the fact that we aid and abet aggresive tax avoidance, if not evasion?
New Labour is on the wain for sure, but justice for the poor goes beyond temporary governments. The rich and multinationals not paying their fair share should not be political. The economic policies of which Guernsey has prospered over the last few decades have proven a poisoned chalice for the vast majority. To think that we defend this, with hysterical pieces like this, just focusses more unwanted attention on us.
http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2009/04/15/is-this-what-guernsey-wants-to-know/
Report abuse
Any truth in the rumour that Damian McBride learned his art from the Guernsey Press reporting of Fallagate?
Report abuse
Before worrying about transparency in UK Government perhaps the Guernsey Press should be more concerned with the comment made by ex States member Bob Chilcott in today’s letters in the Press.
Mr Chilcott says “Furthermore, Ms McNulty Bauer now refuses to tell the taxpayers the cost of her department’s review arrangements with Lord Hunt of the Beachcroft LLP company, which has been contracted to examine the island’s banking industry. What absolute arrogance to tell the paymasters, you and I, that her financial arrangements are commercially sensitive and we cannot be trusted with this information. If a company such as Beachcroft LLB is stipulating that its fees are not to be known publicly, it should not even be considered for this work. My guess is that the fees are seriously high”
Mr Chilcott also questions the extra payment of nearly a quarter of a million pounds to Guernsey Finance. What seems extraordinary is the justification that the extra monies came from ‘unspent’ balances.
Surely Ms McNulty Bauer could have found a home for the spare cash, a home that should benefit islanders and not further subsidise the banks.
Only weeks ago a school was close to closure over a similar sum.
After one year this States seems to be achieving a failure report on the pre election promises of open government and transparency.
Report abuse