Just 28 seats would put four ministers out of States
Monday 15th June 2009, 2:30PM BST.
FOUR of Guernsey’s 11 ministers would probably not have been elected if reforms to slim down the States had been brought in for the 2008 election.
Chief Minister Lyndon Trott, Housing minister Dave Jones, Environment minister Peter Sirett and Public Services minister Bernard Flouquet all took one of the last two seats in their electoral district.
And former Health minister Peter Roffey last week told the Chamber of Commerce that the States should be slimmed down – possibly to just four members for each of the seven districts instead of the current six or seven.
However, Deputy Jones (pictured) saw no reason for change.
‘We have one of the best economies and nearly full employment,’ he said. ‘We need to be careful before tinkering.’
He also said the move would discourage deputies from becoming ministers.
‘Ministers will always have to take decisions that will be unpopular with some people,’ he said. ‘You can reduce the deputies, but you won’t find the same calibre of people wanting to stand as a minister.’
He acknowledged that had the number of seats been reduced he would have lost his.
‘There is a price to pay. If you take on a position of responsibility, you look to get a kicking.’
- To read Guernsey Press stories in full click here for subscription details. Individual editions are now available online.
Island Life
All about Guernsey
Ambassador of the Year 2011
History & Heritage
Visitor Information
Guernsey's government
Campaigns
Voice For Victims
Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.
Seems like a lot of government money being spent on ministers and for what?
There are only 60,000 people on the island.
It’s a big difference between 28 and 42 ministers.
I’d be happy to see 3 to each of the seven districts, not four.
Report abuse
There is an element of truth in what Deputy Jones says here. Although I disagree with him about reducing the number of deputies (in principle I support the idea) without island wide voting there is a danger that high-calibre individuals might lose out in one parish whilst others not fit to govern the proverbial brewery booze up would be elected via another.
Report abuse
In our survey Island Wide Voting survey conducted prior to the 2008 elections a number of things became apparent:
1) Voters largely voted along their parish lines
2) They voted for the best known/popular
The story is accurate inasmuch as that with the current parish based system any reduction in Deputies would have jeopardised the careers of four of Ministers. However a reduction with IWV would be less of a concern for them; they would have all waltzed in.
The results are here:
http://www.ifcfeed.com/articles/detail.aspx?articleid=1879&categoryid=46
Download the PDF at the bottom of the article.
Report abuse