Waste expert’s view criticised

Saturday 25th July 2009, 2:29PM BST.

Rupert DoreyRUPERT DOREY has hit back at an incinerator expert whose comments yesterday cast doubt on the technology behind the Rational Alternative waste proposal.

Mr Dorey, who is heading the alternative proposal, responded yesterday after consultant Jan Manders suggested Guernsey would be making itself a guinea pig for suspect technology if it accepted the Rational Alternative idea.

Mr Manders said Envikraft, the Danish company whose micro-incinerators have been backed in the alternative plan, was a small player in the European waste industry.

He warned the company only had one similar plant to that which is being suggested for Guernsey, at Senja in Norway, and it had suffered a ‘disastrous’ start.

But Mr Dorey (pictured) , whose group’s idea suggests two micro-incinerators and increased recycling instead of Public Services’ £93.5m. mass-burn option, moved to reassure people that the problems experienced at the Norwegian plant were nothing out of the ordinary for a new facility.

‘When the plant was first commissioned, unplanned shutdowns were occurring because of large steel components in the incoming refuse,’ he said.

Mr Dorey said that because Norwegians have to pay to dispose of certain items, including vehicle components, people were concealing objects in municipal waste.

‘These steel components were jamming the augers which transport refuse inside the plant, necessitating a shutdown to remove them,’ he said.


  • To read Guernsey Press stories in full click here for subscription details. Individual editions are now available online.

  1. 1
    Student Bob

    It always makes me laugh that these so-called ‘experts’, with their decades of experience and relevant qualifications, genuinely believe that they somehow know better than a local guy who read an article in the GP then looked up incineration on wikipedia.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    lee hockaday

    Wat a waste of our locals well earned tax payers money !!!!!! Lets think about this, y dont we build a smaller one then put the states members in it who wanna go ahead with this ludicrus proposal………. !!!!!!!

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Terry Jamez

    what next …….. !!!!!! Are the States members gonna try and ellect Gordan Brown a Governer…

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Henry

    Well that’s clear then. 500 against, 61,500 in favour!

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Jamie

    Henry,

    what is clear is 500 against, 0 For (excluding PSD and interested parties) and 61,500 who don’t care.

    If the public think mass burn is such a good idea, then why aren’t they voicing their opinion and having protests etc to make sure it does happen?

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Stephen John

    A number of good letters in the Press today and one from Deptuy Flouquet.

    How can anyone trust someone who has to admit at suuch a late stage that “Public Services fully accepts that the implication was that the plant existed, when in fact it has been approved and is currently still going through the planning process”.

    Later in his letter is another we did not intend to mislead.

    What a contrast between sensible well thought out letters, and the excruciatingly embarrassing one from the PSD Minister.

    The words of Cromwell to Parliament many years ago “In the name of God go” springs to mind.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Mal B Smith

    The problem is that PSD has been giving out so much misleading information and confusing the issue.

    Report abuse

Campaigns

Voice For Victims Voice For Victims

Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.