£81m. runway spending plans to go ahead despite concerns

Saturday 3rd October 2009, 2:29PM BST.

Airport runwayGUERNSEY’S airport runway will be repaired at a cost of £81m., the States decided yesterday.

After more than a day of debate, including three unsuccessful and one successful amendment, the States voted through Public Services’ proposed runway rehabilitation project.

However, there was still strong opposition from a number of members.

Deputy Jan Kuttelwascher, whose sursis last December led to the revision of the entire Public Services report, said at least £12.6m. had been shaved off what the original project would have cost.

He claimed Public Services’ report remained riddled with inaccuracies but he would vote on the proposition, ignoring the quality of the document.

‘I don’t like the report, which is lacking in many areas, but I am not voting on the report, but the propositions.’

Deputy Graham Guille said he could not support something that would not serve Guernsey’s future.

‘Do you honestly sign up to the vision that the future will be business as usual?  Look on the television, airlines are losing billions.’

‘We should go back to the Guernsey way, of living within our means.’

An amendment placed by Deputy Shane Langlois, which would have directed the Public Services Department to go back to the drawing board and return with a true baseline proposal, lost by only two votes.


  • To read Guernsey Press stories in full click here for subscription details. Individual editions are now available online.

  1. 1
    Expat80

    Re: the unecessary expansion of Guernseys Airport. Finally, at last, the most realistic, level headed down-to-earth comment I have heard in many years, one that Guernsey should follow and live by. The words came from Deputy Graham Guille when he said…..
    ” WE SHOULD GO BACK TO THE GUERNSEY WAY, LIVING WITHIN OUR MEANS”.

    Amen.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    TL

    Our air links are vital to this island. This is not an expansion of the airport, but renovation. Without it, we will be stepping backwards (a long way backwards).

    What is the alternative that Deputy Guille suggests? Airlines may be losing money at the moment, but why does that justify letting our airport lose its required standard rating?

    If living within our means involves expecting people to sail here from France or the UK every time, no thanks.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    mac

    Fine if it’s going to cost £81 million!! I hope the States are going to lay the cost squarely at the airport to repay the tax payer. Landing tax should not be treated any differently to cigarettes, alcohol or petrol, We all accept these without protest. Remember it’s not just the general public who flies which will pay but also all the privately owned planes. I believe the user should pay!!

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    the barron

    what ever happens its going to be messy and just look what happened last time did we learn from this?

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    BEMUSED

    I really do not understand why people are opposed to the extention of Guernsey’s runway. I flew into Jersey last week for the first time in a long while and hardly recognized it what with all the improvements. Why does the rest of the world move forward yet Guernsey always seems to go backwards?

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    kevin

    bemused,

    Almost £48,000 per linear metre might have something to do with it.

    Report abuse

Campaigns

Voice For Victims Voice For Victims

Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.