Deputy wants Town to go for World Heritage Site status

Tuesday 27th April 2010, 11:30AM BST.

St Peter port seafront. Town seafrontA ST PETER PORT NORTH deputy is calling for Town to be given World Heritage status.

Deputy Martin Storey has proposed an amendment to the Urban Area Plan requesting that the States investigates how they might seek designation of all or part of Town as a Unesco World Heritage Site.

He believes St Peter Port needs to be protected against unsympathetic development.

‘The people of St Peter Port don’t want their town messing up with new developments and inappropriate buildings when the area should be protected,’ he said.

Deputy Storey added that the honour would also attract more tourists to the island.

His proposed amendment is set to be debated in the States meeting that starts tomorrow.

  • Read the full story in the Guernsey Press. See below for subscription details.

  • To read Guernsey Press stories in full click here for subscription details. Individual editions are now available online.

  1. 1
    StPPlover

    Very, very well done that man. At last someone who recognises what we have is fast losing its charm!

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    AG

    Isn’t Deputy Storey a bit late? I think that there are already some unsympathetic developments.
    Although we all want progress, steel and glass is not always the way to go, what happened to using good ol granite eh?

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Don

    A great idea,and just about in time.St Peter Port is unique,very beautiful,so yes,let it be protected by World Heritage!

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Kurtz

    St Peter Port is really up there with Machu Picchu and the city of Petra!!!!

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Mike

    Why?

    Town is becoming a dump with all the shops closing and the finance industry moving out.

    Report abuse

  6. 6
    Expat80

    Excellent idea! Excellent, excellent, excellent! Well done that man for sure! Now lets see every Guernsey resident support the idea.

    Report abuse

  7. 7
    Micky

    What about St. Sampsons?

    Report abuse

  8. 8
    po boy

    I think the operative words for World Heritage status is that a community “has” preserved its historical look, not “would like to stop not doing so”.
    It is a pity we can not even include the Town Church in the promo shot here.
    Despite this, its a good idea to try anyway and I will be interested to hear what they say about it.

    Report abuse

  9. 9
    RJ

    It’s all a bit late, the markets have been spoilt, and glass monsters are plain to view all the way along the east coast.

    Still, if it stops more unsympathetic buildings, it’s a good thing.

    Report abuse

  10. 10
    Gormley's statue

    Criteria for world heritage status, one of these criteria have to be met (apologies but I’ve lifted this from Wikipedia) and for the town to be of outstanding universal value:

    I. “to represent a masterpiece of human creative genius”; No

    II. “to exhibit an important interchange of human values, over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world, on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts, town-planning or landscape design”; No

    III. “to bear a unique or at least exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilization which is living or which has disappeared”; No

    IV. “to be an outstanding example of a type of building, architectural or technological ensemble or landscape which illustrates (a) significant stage(s) in human history”; No

    V. “to be an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement, land-use, or sea-use which is representative of a culture (or cultures), or human interaction with the environment especially when it has become vulnerable under the impact of irreversible change”; No

    VI. “to be directly or tangibly associated with events or living traditions, with ideas, or with beliefs, with artistic and literary works of outstanding universal significance. (The Committee considers that this criterion should preferably be used in conjunction with other criteria.) No

    Natural criteria N/A

    VII. “to contain superlative natural phenomena or areas of exceptional natural beauty and aesthetic importance”;

    VIII. “to be outstanding examples representing major stages of Earth’s history, including the record of life, significant on-going geological processes in the development of landforms, or significant geomorphic or physiographic features”;

    IX. “to be outstanding examples representing significant on-going ecological and biological processes in the evolution and development of terrestrial, fresh water, coastal and marine ecosystems and communities of plants and animals”;

    X. “to contain the most important and significant natural habitats for in-site conservation of biological diversity, including those containing threatened species of outstanding universal value from the point of view of science or conservation.”

    I don’t reckon that St Peter Port satisfies any of these criteria. Much as Deputy Storey is a very pleasant man, I don’t think that he has really thought this one through?

    Report abuse

  11. 11
    simon

    GS
    III. “to bear a unique or at least exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilization which is living or which has disappeared”; No
    Why not?

    Report abuse

  12. 12
    Truth Man

    Gormley’s statue:

    Thanks for the breakdown, I must admit when I read the article I wondered if Mr Storey was having delusions of grandeur on behalf of St Peter Port! It is quite a nice town, but there are a lot of those in the world! As sad as it is, I think St Peter Port is hardly deserving of World Heritage Status.

    I don’t understand why we need such a tag to protect town from unsightly development anyway – haven’t we got a whole States department (that we pay for) doing that for us?! If they are not performing as we would wish, then let democracy take its course.

    Report abuse

  13. 13
    valeite

    Yes what about St.Sampsons, I think the Bridge area is a disgrace and needs attention, why did they not make the marina down there partly a visitors marina and they could have had a local market on the Crocq every Saturday morning,lets see some new life down there and see some new money pumped into this area, lets see a Bridge across from South to North and get the clogging up of traffic a thing of the past(all because someone takes ages reversing out of their space)and like idiots we sit there waiting.

    Report abuse

  14. 14
    Gormley's Statue

    Simon, I’m not seeing it myself. St Peter Port is a nice enough town but its not astonishing or the sort of place that justifies an international award or preservation order.

    Presumably you’d go for “exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition” but I’m not sure that it is a testimony to a cultural tradition, or indeed exceptional. If you look at the kind of places that have been given an award under that cateory you’ll see that St Peter Port would find itself hard pressed to justify inclusion.

    Report abuse

  15. 15
    A.J.

    It would have been a good idea 50 years ago but that,s another story

    Report abuse

  16. 16
    Les Smith

    As a visitor to Guernsey for over 50 years I have been appalled recently over the loss of Town’s unique character. Only when it’s too late will Guernsey realise what it has done to itself. The recent glass and concrete buildings are out of context and scale for the islands. The loss of the market was a big blow – am I the only one that preferred the smell of fresh flowers to the smell of fresh DVDs, CDs and computer games. You have a very beautiful island please don’t destroy it.

    Report abuse

Campaigns

Voice For Victims Voice For Victims

Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.