The facts on that bus fare rise…
Wednesday 30th June 2010, 2:41PM BST.
AFTER much pushing and prodding from this newspaper, Environment finally came clean. The proposed increase to bus fares is a cynical ploy to get bus users to give the department a £400,000 pay rise.
What for is not clear. It could be frittered in all sorts of ways and, representing as it does about 10 staff, is a marvellous fillip to staff recruitment.
The vague ‘in due course’ it might be returned to Treasury is simply not good enough – no department should be making fast and loose with public funds in this manner.
There are two worrying aspects to this. Firstly, whatever Environment may say, it has no traffic strategy because there is nothing measurable or deliverable behind its mantra of ‘giving freedom of transport choice’. And, in any event, what is that supposed to achieve?
Secondly, there is no evidence that the department has paid much regard to the Tribal Group’s involvement in the fundamental spending reviews. Its officers were staggered at the lack of thought that had gone into the huge subsidy lavished on Island Coachways – or what the taxpayer was getting in return.
It urged a full review of how best to operate a bus service in Guernsey, and that would have included seeking other operators, negotiating contract options and assessing the viability of each and aiming to bring in a fresh start based on as close to zero subsidy as possible when the current Island Coachways contract ended.
How much of that – if any – has been done is not clear, but Tribal believed that £3.6m. could be saved over five years, equivalent to £724,600 p.a.
Yet Environment’s response appears to have been keeping things exactly as they are and transferring £400,000 a year from the back pocket of bus users straight into the department’s coffers.
It actually beggars belief and highlights two things: the department’s lack of commitment to meaningful savings and its unsuitability to be involved in traffic matters.
Having destroyed the paid parking-subsidised buses carrot and stick approach to minimising car use in St Peter Port, it now wants to penalise those few who currently choose to use the buses.
And pretends it is a strategy…
Island Life
All about Guernsey
Ambassador of the Year 2011
History & Heritage
Visitor Information
Guernsey's government
Campaigns
Voice For Victims
Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.
Well sniffed out GP
As I said in another thread, Sirrett and Co do not have a plan, they are bereft of strategic thinking and the traveling public has no faith or confidence whatsoever in this bunch of clueless shysters.
I for one would like to see them forced to give this 400k back to the bus users in the form of £400,000 worth of improvements to the current service.
Report abuse
Martino
I am right there with you.
Frustrated and angry at the problems I was experiencing with the buses, I talked to some of the drivers and asked why things were so bad. I was shocked at what I was told.
Because Environment has decided that there should be more and later bus services, but have given no funding for this, drivers are struggling to meet all the shift and service requirements. Many start work bewteen 6am-7am and finish between 8pm-10pm. They are frequently asked to cover services in their meal breaks.
So why is Environment asking for just under another £1/2million in subsidy when public transport workers are enduring longer hours and worse conditions than the American slave colonies?
Report abuse
Hi Coyote
read your post and thought wow! I was chatting up one of the bus drivers and I asked him why he looked so miserable all the time. He said he wasn’t miserable, just tired cos he hadn’t had a day off for about three weeks. If the drivers work those hours you say no wonder he looked miserable. And I thought he was just trying to put me off!
Report abuse