Opinion of third lawyer sows seeds of doubt for Treasury

Wednesday 15th September 2010, 11:30AM BST.

Charles ParkinsonA THIRD legal opinion about the security offered by a ‘golden share’ put enough doubt in the minds of Treasury’s board to make it unanimously decide to scrap the Aurigny deal, its minister has confirmed.

Deputy Charles Parkinson (pictured) yesterday spoke of the circumstances that led to his department pulling out of the sale.

He also defended the decision to pursue the proposal during the last two months, saying it was part of the department’s mandate to ‘periodically review whether to continue to own Aurigny is in the States’ best interests’.

‘Before the deal in principle was announced we had taken advice from two sets of lawyers and felt fairly confident at that stage that it [golden share] would secure the slots,’ he said. ‘In the due diligence process we took advice from another lawyer and, as with a lot of cases, lawyers have differing views. Based on the advice we had to make a decision and felt that, in the event of rapid insolvency, there was a risk that the slots could be lost.’

  • Read the full story in the Guernsey Press. See below for subscription details.

  1. 1
    Darren

    2 versus 1 = 1 in favour of selling?

    I’m no mathematician but I’d still go with the majority.

    How much did it cost for 3 legal opinions I wonder, and why don’t the States rely on their in house legal team? Or appointed team from one of the big firms?

    It does smack of incompetence yet again.

    If it is in the States best interests the periodically review whether it is a good idea to own Aurigny then why own it at all? I know the argument about slots will come up, but we are talking about ifs and big ifs at that.

    If it came to it there would be no problem flying into Jersey and making a transfer….

    Must be some other ‘golden handshake’ in the background from somewhere….

    The non-commercial in-confidence information should be shared with Gsy folk so they are able to see the rationale for the decision making process.

    Report abuse

Campaigns

Voice For Victims Voice For Victims

Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.