Seeds of dispute sown at airport

Monday 31st January 2011, 2:30PM GMT.

WITH depressing predictability comes news that the Town firefighters are locked in a pay dispute with the Public Sector Remuneration Committee.

From the minute details emerged of the settlement won by the airport firefighters in April last year it was odds-on that their Arsenal colleagues and the PSRC would find it impossible to agree a deal.

The Town firefighters, understandably, will have taken one look at the airport agreement and believed they were just as deserving.

After all, they also work unsociable shifts and are expected to cover at short notice colleagues who fall sick and, of course, they too have to be willing to put their lives on the line.

The difficulty, of course, lies in the quite extraordinary deal struck by airport firefighters.

Whether you believe the total deal to be worth 16% (as a disgruntled member of the previous PSRC calculated) or look simply at the baseline figure of a 7.8% increase in pensionable pay it was a ground-breaking deal.

Added to that 7.8% were all sorts of goodies, ranging from a 3% rise in non-pensionable pay every three years and another 3% for meeting training needs every four years. Oh, and some undisclosed standby payments and a one-off sum.

Of course, tied to that were several strings, including a no-strike deal, guaranteed airport cover and extra work – but the total package appeared  jaw-dropping in its generosity.

Critics claimed it would open the floodgates for other public bodies but there was always one group of States employees bound to pay greater attention than any other: Town firefighters.

They, too, have battled for years with the much-maligned States pay bargaining system.

The ‘one-size-fits-all’ system has been thoroughly discredited by a series of reports, most notably the £170,000 tribunal of inquiry.

That report demanded the PSRC role must change, politicians should back away and overall responsibility be handed to the Policy Council.

Interestingly, it also argued that PSRC placed too much reliance on third parties such as an industrial disputes tribunals to resolve disputes.

Little has changed.


  1. 1
    biased

    I like your comments, especially after listening to radio guernsey’s interview with unite boss & chair of psrc. what a shambles, can i ask if anybody who heard interview actually heard a clear answer from the psrc. i will be watching for what is said in march’s tribunal with interest. i feel it will be dejavu and more money from the coffers. we dont here much reference black hole now corporate tax coming back, firefighters may well get a good payout. good luck to them.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    M Le MOIGNAN

    I adgree with the above comment and the Editors comment and from an outsider looking in it would appear that the competiences of the Arsenal Firefighters are greater than those of the Airport Firefighters.
    At least at the moment there does not appear to be any industrial action looming, unlike the actions of the Airport!

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Dick Norey

    Here here Milton, well said.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    DaveR

    M Le Moignan Can you quantify in what way you consider Airport Firefighters are incompetent in comparison with Arsenal Firefighters?
    Both will risk their lives to rescue you from either a burning building or a burning aircraft that has crashed.
    Are you suggesting that the Airport Firemen are not trained to carry out their job as well as the Arsenal Firemen?
    The problem is that despite spending £170,000 on a tribunal, it’s finding have been ignored and changes have not taken place which may have prevented the current situation arising.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    biased

    I think we are getting side tracked here people, no one is saying that either firefighting service is not properly trained to do the role they are given. What is at the front of everyones mind is, why do PSRC want a tribunal especially after ex PSRC members have reported in the press that they are fully aware that the GFRS are worth more for the role they carry out. Do the current PSRC believe they will be exhonorated from being blamed for a pay award if a third party awards it. Do they really think the public will care who awards the cash, they will just wonder why they are paying civil servants an awful lot of cash per year to not negotiate and play games. How many workers could have a rise if we binned the negotiators. £???,???.??’s in savings would be a better service especially as it looks like they are saying to the public after a £170,000.00 tribunal that they don’t care what the findings were they will carry on as usual anyway. Its a shame the other bodies when putting up the water rates or waste water charges or TRP or gas or electric don’t go to a negotiating body who wants to play games & delegate responsibility to others before a decision is made over say a year or more. It is no longer becoming viable to be a states employee and live off of low wages and the pride of service to the community. What next, means testing for a wage rise?

    Report abuse

Campaigns

Voice For Victims Voice For Victims

Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.