UK link fears spread

Friday 19th August 2011, 10:00AM BST.

UK link fears spread

0998589AURIGNY’S decision to reduce services between Alderney and Southampton is concerning many islanders.

Since I broke the story last week, I have been inundated with emails and telephone calls about the issue, which involves the airline cutting the number of Alderney-Southampton flights by 9% from November.

Not one person is supporting Aurigny’s move – and many fear it could be the beginning of the end of direct services to the UK. The Guernsey Press has already reported the concerns of hoteliers and guest house owners, while States members are promising to look closely at the changes.

Alderney’s Southampton service is often called a ‘lifeline link’ and that phrase is more telling now than ever before. The island is back to having one air carrier – Aurigny – after Blue Islands halted services earlier this year. What is more, it is the only direct link with the UK that Alderney has.

The people who have approached me in the wake of the news all agree that flying from Southampton is, more often than not, the easiest way of getting to Alderney. Passengers also tend to agree that taking more than one flight is inconvenient when there is a direct route. Flying unnecessarily in the Channel Islands also heightens the risk of getting stranded, possibly due to technical issues or fog (which is much more likely).

Aurigny’s research apparently shows that people are travelling from all across the UK to fly from Southampton. But perhaps getting to the south coast and waiting for Joey is all part of the Alderney experience? People also have a loyalty to Alderney – they want to fly direct to the island and have nothing to do with Guernsey, or anywhere else.

I can see where Aurigny is coming from, even though I remain concerned about this latest development. I use the airline’s Alderney-Manchester link regularly as I often spend time in Leeds – my home city – and the service is generally the most cost-effective and quickest way to travel between the island and the north of England. However, the link doesn’t operate without its frustrations.

The major bugbear with the route comes during Aurigny’s winter timetable.

Earlier this year, I often had to travel back from Manchester on a Monday morning at 9am. The flight gets you to Guernsey for 10.20am but there’s then a five-hour wait to catch a connection to Alderney. To be frank, it isn’t good enough for islanders, tourists or business people.

Thankfully, the summer timetable is much improved. On Tuesday, for example, I was back in Alderney before midday after taking off from Manchester at 9am.

So if Aurigny is to continue down the road of opening up different parts of the UK, it must get its Bailiwick house in order first.

It’s no good trying to attract people from Manchester, the Midlands or London if they’re going to be stuck in Guernsey for hours with the threat of fog and other problems.

And for the sake of everyone associated with Alderney, I hope Aurigny doesn’t reduce the Southampton service ever again.


  1. 1
    Hello

    Keeping BI off the route removed a perfect excuse for Aurigny to drop Southampton. I wonder if Mr Hart is now quite so pleased with the support Alderney gave him last year?

    We need a Plan B in place and have to assume the worst of Aurigny. The stakes for us all are too high to ignore this threat.

    Report abuse

  2. 2
    Hello

    Aurigny have just sent this e-mail to Alderney Customers

    http://system.newzapp.co.uk/GPage.asp?LID=OSwxODc0MTU0NDQ=

    Mr Hart gives a commitment to Alderney but to my mind it stops short of a commitment to the Southampton route. I may be wrong….?

    Of course Trislanders are expensive to run and maintain so how about some new aeroplanes to see us through the next 25 years? There are plenty of up to date options that will fit our runway.

    Report abuse

  3. 3
    Rees Bryant

    I have just received the e-mail referred to by Hello. Loads of guff, but no firm commitment to the Southampton route. Just like the letter printed in the Alderney Press. Mr Hart protesteth too much. All that is needed is one simple sentence. Why is that so difficult? Silly question.

    The Aurigny staff in Alderney are first class – if only we could say the same for their bosses in Guernsey.

    Report abuse

  4. 4
    Ed

    The reason they want people through Guernsey rather than Southampton is so that they get people taking 2 Aurigny flights (for example MAN – GCI – ACI) as opposed to 1 Flybe flight (MAN – SOU) and then Aurigny (SOU – ACI), thereby ceasing to aid a nearby competitor by removing their transfer traffic.

    Reducing capacity is foolhardy because it means that people will come to rely on a mainland link via Guernsey (which is less convenient for the people of Alderney), and the route could eventually be dropped all together in response to a serious decline in passenger numbers sometime in the next decade.

    Report abuse

  5. 5
    Peter ChaisitCharles

    Whilst the continued threat of cuts to transport links to Alderney continues,it can only serve to further dent the already unacceptable infrastructure . As an airlink is essential , the only way forward is to ensure local support which is highly unlikely unless the service is practically governed by the local authority . Now that Aurigny ,as a company , has moved so far from Alderney ,steps must be taken early and comprehensively,rather than wait for the obviously disinterested parties to pull the plug.

    Report abuse

Wednesday 22 February

  • Nine more jobs shed at Guernsey Post
  • Man assaulted outside his home
  • The new-look House and Home
  • HalfTIME junior sport special
  • Arts - 'Tremble Clefs' head for Eisteddfod

Campaigns

Voice For Victims Voice For Victims

Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.