Drug import couple see jail term cut
Wednesday 13th March 2013, 3:00PM GMT.
Mandy and Michael Falla had their sentences reduced by one year in the Court of Appeal.
A FORMER detective and his wife had their eight-year sentence for drug importation and money laundering reduced by a year by the Guernsey Court of Appeal yesterday.
Both Michael and Mandy Falla pleaded guilty in the Royal Court in November to transferring £62,150 to the bank account of a drug supplier and importing 1.588kg of synthetic cannabinoids with a local street value of between £23,835 and £31,780.
However, advocates Andrew Ayres and Clare Tee, respectively representing the couple, argued that Judge Dame Heather Steel had not given appropriate consideration to the mitigating circumstances of the case at the time.
The couple were given eight years for the money laundering offence, but four years to run concurrently for the importation offence.
Judge of appeal Nigel Pleming QC, who was joined by Jonathan Crowe QC, and Bailiff of Jersey Michael Birt QC, said they were satisfied that the 10-year starting point was justified and did not accept there should be a further reduction for Michael Falla’s age or the family’s ‘fall from grace’.
However he added that the judges were not convinced credit had been given for the defendants’ previous good character and therefore reduced the sentence.
- To read Guernsey Press stories in full click here for subscription details. Individual editions are now available online.
Campaigns
Voice For Victims
Voice for Victims is a campaign aimed at promoting the rights of those affected by child sexual abuse.
What does, “previous good character” mean exactly? Does it mean,”not being found out? And, why are some sentences carried out concurrently.
Report abuse
Whats the point of giving any sentance if your only going to reduce it ?
Report abuse
Had this been a one off offence maybe I could understand.
They systematically imported drugs over a period, so they were not of good character.
Plus this was a retired police officer who knew exactly what the law, and consequences were.
Finally, involving the whole family was an absolute criminal disgrace.
Report abuse
Unless extensively substantiated (thanks Ed) i have never understood how anybody including a judge can use such a phrase when they know sod all about a persons previous character and using this rubbish to reduce a sentence should not be allowed unless somehow proven.
Report abuse